
Most of us would agree with gay rights pioneer Professor Dennis Altman, who recently criticised a few activists’ fixation on “gay marriage” and described the whole push as “self-indulgent crap”.
Certainly, the research findings, and these community attitudes align with the latest data out of Tasmania, and New Zealand, where the numbers of relationships registered under the various schemes available in those places are just over 100, and less than 1500 respectively.
The very people who are supposed to be clamouring for relationship recognition are literally staying away in droves.
As a same sex-attracted man, and a Catholic, I must say I read Muriel Porter’s comments about gay Christians apparently needing to keep their identity secret from church, family, and friends (The Australian, May 6, 2008), and wondered if she’d actually spoken to any committed gay Christians, or same sex-attracted Catholics.
Could it be that Porter, and others, while aiming for compassion and fellow-feeling, have instead fallen into shallow political correctness and adopted patronising attitudes that don’t conform with the lived experience and expressed desires of real same sex-attracted Australians?
Interesting…
In the previous thread about gay marriage here at my blog some of my pro Gay marriage correspondents were getting very hot under the collar about the issue and most cited the notion that to not allow same sex couples the right to “marry” was a terrible “discrimination”. All were making the assumption that a “marriage” was what most homosexuals wanted out of life, John Heard’s article makes it clear that this is very far from being the case for most same sex attracted people.
As I said previously a marriage between a man and a woman has the purpose of creating and nurturing the next generation, It provides a recognition of a child’s linage, confers some innate rights of inheritance to those children and it is the foundation stone of our society. The fact that only a very small minority of practising homosexuals actually want to be in any sort of exclusive monogamous unions that are even vaguely analogous to heterosexual marriage suggests that the gay activists have grossly missread their own constituency and that the model offered by the government reforms is in fact a better fit for what gays actually want.
Cheers Comrades
Hat tip To Mark Richardson

but I could not help but think that the story about the long awaited appeal against the manifestly inadequate sentences handed down By Sarah Bradley in the Aurukun Rape case has a good chance of slipping under the radar while the frenzy of commentary on Wayne Swan’s first budget runs its course, I am not at all surprised because no matter who is in government we are fed the details, or at least the overall intentions in a series of “leaks” in the period leading up to the budget, I though that it was a better use of my time to take a nap rather than listen to Swans less than dulcet tones as he droned through his speech, looking through the reports this morning certainly shows that there are no real
surprises, a means test for the baby bonus that cuts in at $150,000 which makes one wonder just how many fewer Bonuses will be paid, not that many I guess, likewise the increase in tax on luxury cars will probably make very little difference to those who can afford them because you can bet that when they “trade up” they will get just that bit more for their older model and as someone else has pointed out elsewhere the whole point of having a swanky car is for the ostentatious display of wealth and increasing the cost of such cars merely makes them more of a status symbol, the old line about if you have to ask the price of a Rolls Royce then you can’t afford one comes to mind…


The survivors made the journey in rickety wooden boats with makeshift sails fashioned out of blankets, dodging the bloated corpses of buffaloes and dead neighbours floating in the murky waters.


































Commentary