Home » Posts tagged 'sex'
Tag Archives: sex
It was very nicer to read in the OZ this morning that the federal back bench of the Labor party is finally realising that Joolia letting the Greens set their agenda on the government is not such a good idea. Frankly it is a very good way to both loose uberleft voters to the Greens (why vote for the wagged when you can vote for the wagger?) and a good way to lose their traditional supporters (why vote for the wagged when you can vote the party that will stand up for ordinary Aussies?).
Those Labor members on the back benches have the most to lose should the bill proposed by Brown get up. No that is not quite correct, the terminally ill have the most to lose because were this bill to get up it would be an express lane to legalising euthanasia and Gay marriage. The former is of course something that can so easily be the subject of abuse by those who stand to gain by the demise of a terminally ill person* and the latter is simply window dressing for a Gay agenda to remould the wider community in the shape of the gay subculture. (how long will it be before this type of trousers become part of school uniforms ? 😉 )
The ALP members are realising that they may need the Greens to hold office now but if they want to dock that annoying tail after the next election then they had better make sure that they still have a viable dog in the mean time.
*isn’t it amazing that those who are so “for” euthanasia are so often anti-capital punishment?
And should we really care?
Just who the hell can you believe in this saga about 47 yearold AFL player manager Ricky Nixon and the 17 yearold lying tart (hey sorry for calling her that but like shes pretty upfront about that herself) and should we really care anymore?
This has gone beyond controversy and outrage and the treatment of young girls by AFL players. Now it looks like we even have the HeraldSun involved in a sting to set Tricky Dicky up by paying for the girls hotel, getting her to call him early in the morning all distressed like so that he comes around and then the paper films him as he leaves her hotel.
Not that I think Nixon is any innocent here. He doesn’t come across all that believable himself. And if you read between the lines in Caroline Wilsons story from The Age she seems to be saying that Nixon is a cokehead or something like that and that his lifestyle is out of control.
One thing is for sure – the girl at the centre of all this is a liar and a schemer who admits to stealing others property (including Nixons credit card details and using them to buy airline tickets) illegal filming and setting Nixon and other people up to look like arseholes:
Police had taken her to a city police station, where she was questioned about possible offences including drug possession and secretly filming AFL player manager Ricky Nixon.
She also stole photos of the naked footballers and said she took the photos later admitting she didnt take them but lied to ‘get even’ – after showing photos of their c*cks to the world! This was after she said she was pregnant to a footballer and miscarried but theres no proof of it. And she admits to trying to ‘sell’ photos to Nixon (read blackmail) last year when she wanted $20,000 off him otherwise she would release the photos of the naked Saints players he manages – you know, the ones that she stole. She tried to sell them to the media too.
Okay I realise that if Nixon did bonk her then at worst he has taken advantage of a vulnerable mixed up girl. Or at best hes a fool and a real sleazebag who should have been more responsible and kept his johnson in his pants. And if he gave her alcohol and cocaine hes even worse. But … I mean, this girl …. go figure!
I am beyond caring about her and him and the whole thing. What about you?
Im blaming the HeraldSun!
The T-shirt that shocked Queensland
Some people want to ban this T-shirt showing a woman bound & and gagged with the slogan: “Relax it’s just sex.”
They say it promotes violence against women.
But there are some pretty mixed views (and mixed-up ones too) about this garment.
Let’s take a look and see who is right and whether this Tshirt is all bad, neither here nor there or f*cken great!
Queensland’s Minister for Women, Karen Struthers, wants shops to stop selling it:
“There’s nothing good here. It’s not erotic, it’s not pornography, it’s just absolute violence,”
But Matt Rooke the Oz distributor says it’s just for people who like kinky sex. Max reckons Ms Struthers is just being a prude and “ridiculous” by demanding shops remove his best seller. He says politicians should not tell people what they can wear (obviously he’s never heard of Cory Bernardi the Liberal MP who wants to publically derobe Muslim women):
“We don’t advocate any sort of violence against women, or anybody for that matter,” Max said. “It’s a bondage T-shirt, which is just certain people’s own interpretation of sex.”
Back to Ms Struthers:
“… we’ve got to actually draw a line here about what becomes violence and what portrays women in a way that says violence against women is acceptable. And that’s what this does.”
“The evidence shows that the more women continue to be portrayed in the media and advertising as objects of sexual gratification, as objects for physical violation, the more that produces attitudes in young boys, young men, older men that it’s OK to physically violate and sexually violate women. The evidence is very clear.”
And feminist academic Catharine Lumby of UNSW is “concerned” (but confused!):
“I’m concerned about any sort of T-shirt or banner or poster or any public form of expression that is encouraging people to view women as sexual objects, or as objects to be attacked,” she said.
But Professor Lumby says it is a mistake to think that banning T-shirts can stop sexual assaults.”Do I think that those things cause sexual assault? No.”
“What causes sexual assault are attitudes and they might be reinforced by T-shirts or banners, but they start much younger,” she said.
“It doesn’t matter what the woman’s wearing. It doesn’t matter what the man is wearing or what videos he’s watching. What matters is behaviour and attitudes towards women – they are the things we need to change. What matters is getting very good education into schools about sexual ethics.”
Huh? So does she want them banned or not? This is chicken & egg stuff – I think we just have to make up our own minds. I dunno if you can ban Tshirts but I guess if you ban Burqas like Cory wants to then you have crossed that line into the fashion fascists police and we will be having our cops going round ripping clothes off people in public and exposing their breasts instead of handing out speeding fines and raiding bikie gangs like they should be doing.
I would not wear this Tshirt and I reckon any bloke who does is kindar making a statement about one thing or the other. I mean, if you went to the pub wearing one you are not going to have much luck with most chicks you try to chat up. Its a bit of a giveaway that you are either a rapist a missoginist or a sexual deveant.
Well At least you’d know that any chick who likes your fashion style is your kind of gal. And if one actually chats you up Ii reckon you would know shes ready and willing to popbackhome for a bit of hardcore S&M. It pays to advertise.
But if you wore it down the local supermarket you might as well carry a sign that says ‘out of my way – I am a sicko’. on the plus side you are gunna be given a pretty wide berth in the isles and not have to fight your way past old ladies and mums with their screaming snottienosed kids.
Then there is the issue of is this another example of the pornification of society that is desensatising the minds of males and teaching young kids and old farts too that its okay to portrait women this way as sex objects?
The antiporn arguments have been attacked and shot down by some bloggers who say its an “anything goes” world of porn. They say censorship of any kind is bad but porn is good and does not hurt nobody. But some of those same bloggers also say we should not demeen women as sex slaves to the lusty desires of men so they would be contradicting themselves if they say this Tshirt is okay and people have a right to sell it and a right to wear it.
And then there is the argument put forward above by the minster and the feminist academic that it is not pornographhy but violence against women that the T shirt is portraiting and encouraging as an acceptable norm. It depends on your perspextive I suppose. We see a lot of violence on TV and on computer iphone games too. Chopping off peoples heads and kicking the shit out of them is everywhere.
Its a very vexed question and I dunno about this Tshirt and what to make of it. But I might by one for Laura – she likes to being tied up.
I am sorry to start your day off Iain with a photo of two blokes kissing but this gay marriage campaign is a farce. Its time I stepped in and straightened out a few miscontraceptions that are being deliberately pushed by the internets leading gay marriage advocate like this one:
Here in Australia, we have the two biggest parties determined to discriminate against gay and lesbian people for as long as possible, despite neither of them having an argument any stronger than “that’s the way John Howard defined it”.
I don’t know how anybody with a sense of justice or fairness could give their first preference to either of them.
This is nothing more than a dirty political trick designed to mislead Australian poofters and lesbians into voting Green. No wonder they are getting 12% in the polls.
The Marriage Act does not discriminate (except against someone’s age*). It does not say “if you are homosexual you cannot get married” or “if you are a lesbian you cannot get married”.
Lots of gays get married. All the time. Think about it.
Does the priest say to a bride & groom, “Do you, Harold, take it up the rear?” Or, “Do you, Doris, go muff diving on a regular basis?” No. He doesn’t. He doesn’t even care. He might even be gay himself. If hes a Catholic he definitely is.
And when you sign a marriage certificate does it say, “Tick here if you are gay.” No. The law does not care either.
Poofs & Lesbos already have the same rights as any other man or woman to be married and can marry a man if they are a woman and vice versa.
This is not discrimination. Marriage is not about sex or who you have sex with. Since when did you have to be married to have gay sex? Or real sex? With anyone?
I am not married to Laura but she has sex with me (and lots of other blokes) all the time. She has it with women too. Big deal. And Norm who owns BlueGums where I live is married but he has sex with the permanents in exchange for site fees. Man or woman. See?
Gay people of Australia – do not be fooled by the likes of the blogger I quoted who is beating this gay drum. He is not in tune. He is not even gay!
This is a Greens Party conspiracy to take control of our government.
The Greens dont even care about gay marriage. They dont believe in any kind of marriage. They are communists and hedonists who only believe in free love, free money, free drugs and no ties whatsoever. Get it?
The Greens will ruin the country and send gays to detention camps and, instead, let all the boat people take over. They will close down our power plants and make the boat people work on low wages to grow vegetables and marijuana to feed all the other Greens.
And finally, they will stop the internet filter and let all the pedo stuff in and … *lower the age of consent* so they can have sex with whoever they like.
They are sickos.
I am not kidding.
Poofs & lesbians you have been warned.
(Authorised jointly by The Australian Sex Party & Steve Fielding of Family First)
“Can’t we just f***? I am a 19-year-old girl, what is wrong with you?”
This poor girl just wanted a root, so she joined the police force where she thought she might find some real men who would give her one or two (hundred).
What is wrong with that? What is wrong with NSW coppers, are they all gay?
This story speaks for itself and I am almost speechless that this girl was knocked back again & again. Then they sacked her!
She should try Melbourne where there are lots of desperate men who would not say no to a head job in a dunny.
A POLICE officer who was sacked after begging colleagues for sex has lost her unfair dismissal claim.
Within days of being posted Jessica Parfrey propositioned her supervisor to have an affair because “everyone knows you’re supposed to fall in love with your buddy”.
A month later, after he turned her down, she told him: “Can’t we just f***? I am a 19-year-old girl, what is wrong with you?”
The Industrial Relations Commission in Sydney heard that Ms Parfrey also offered an officer oral sex in a pub toilet and carpark and later propositioned another, saying: “I know you want me.”
Both men refused.
She tried to call another colleague 12 times, left six text messages and then offered to help him study for his police exams by stripping off an item of clothing for every question he got correct. He refused.
Ms Parfrey was sacked from the police in September 2007, five months into her probation.
Nothing more to say.
The Premier and the barmaid: Did he do her or didn’t he? And if not why not? And if so who gives a sh*t?
I am most surprised to read the steamy allegations made by the peroxide blonde American barmaid Michelle that she “fell under the spell” of South Australian Premier Mike Rann and had really sick sex with him: on his desk .. on his office floor … on a golf course … and in a dunny!
But what surprises me most is not that he would do her if given the chance. I mean, why the hell not? No, what surprise me is that SHE would actually do HIM in first place. He’s not exactly Errol Flynn or Tom Cruise or Engelbert Humperdinck or Julio Iglasis now is he? There’s no sexual attraction pouring out of Mike’s pours. – he looks more like a poofter choir boy. Well, he IS from Adelaide.
Good luck to Mikey if he did actually get it in and get it off with her but I reckon this thing might have been cooked up by Michelle and her “estranged” husband who just happens to be going to court next week for … wait for it … assaulting Mike Rann with a rolled up magazine!
I reckon the $200,000 she got for telling the porkies about porking might just cover Mr Michelle’s legal costs, who can now go to the Judge and say:
“Your honour, I had good reason to belt him – he f*cked my wife.”
That is all. It’s only South Australia, which doesn’t really count. Who gives a sh*t?