Iain Hall's SANDPIT

Home » Islamist Terror threats » David Hicks

Category Archives: David Hicks

Guess Who

Click for source

Cheers Comrades

David Hicks may not be able to keep the money from his “Holiday at Club Gitmo” Book, or its about time!!!!

Ah the never ending saga of our favorite Aussie Jihadist; Yep its another story about Hicks, only this time its one which will undoubtedly upset his fan club (Hi PKD 😉  ) because it seem that the Commonwealth is finally going to seize the profits form his self-serving holiday memoir:

click for source

My only question here is why has it taken them so long to act here?

Cheers Comrades

Latte Sippers™ for David Hicks!

I’m not sure which is more disturbing, the thought of fawning Latte sippers lining up to get David Hicks to sign his book or the notion that he might profit from it.

click for source

Notice too  how the Age skips over the salient fact that Hicks trained with al Qaeda  and declared allegiance to  Osama Bin laden? Hmm I very much hope that the profits from this book are seized by the Commonwealth, but I am cynical enough to expect that they won’t be because the Labor government and their masters the Greens will ensure that Hicks is able to profit from his crimes, just as they caved in to the spurious law suits from that other terrorist Mandoub Haib.

If Hicks was genuine  about wanting to put those , err,” indiscretions” behind him, then he would just look to the future and not try to profit from a very disgraceful past.

Cheers Comrades

Osama Bin Laden

There are not words enough

Cheers indeed Comrades!!!!!

Playing with a marked deck

The reason that most people have a serious disdain for lawyers is that they  charge rather exorbitant fees for what they do but there are times when they themselves can be the victims of some , shall we say “sharp practice” from a client. Hands up anyone who is surprised that the countries second favourite Club Gitmo terrorist tourist  Mamdouh Habib is now being sued by his former lawyer for a slice of the money that he has been able to con out of the Australian government.

The correspondence points out that at the time Mr Habib dispensed with Mr Erman’s services, a date had already been set for the mediation session that resulted in the settlement reached on December 17 with representatives of Attorney-General Robert McClelland.

After terminating Mr Erman’s services in the commonwealth case, Mr Habib arranged for another lawyer to accompany him to the session with the Attorney-General’s representatives, where the settlement was reached.

The correspondence on behalf of Mr Erman claims the solicitor has a lien, or legal entitlement, over funds received by Mr Habib in the settlement, the amount of which has been kept secret. The Attorney-General’s office has refused to disclose the amount of the payout and Mr Habib was obliged to sign a secrecy clause, under which he says he can be fined $100,000 if he discloses any of the details.

Truman Hoyle does not specify how much the solicitor claims to be owed and Mr Habib has yet to receive a bill from Mr Erman, who has acted for him in a string of legal cases since his return from Guantanamo Bay in January 2005.

However, a letter from Mr Erman dated December 24 states: “Our estimate is that your total legal fees, for which you will be responsible, should not exceed $2,200,000, including GST.”

On this occasion I actually think that the Lawyer has a case because it sounds to me like the man in the “Club Gitmo” shirt really thought that by jumping out of the cab just before the destination he could avoid paying the fare. Strangely I am not surprised that this man with  no higher purpose but the acquisition of money should act this way. It sorta makes our  Davo look like a much better class of  terrorist tourist who deserves some respect for at least avoiding these sorts of shenanigans and getting his life back on track.

If there is a lesson here it is simply this; when you set out to play a hand full of victim cards don’t forget that the dealer at the table will want his cut and woe betide the player who thinks otherwise.

Finally I just couldn’t get this song out of my head while writing this so I’ll share it with the Sandpit:

Cheers Comrades
Photobucket Pictures, Images and Photos

Payouts to fomer Club Gitmo Jihadists residents

One of my regular readers sent me this little missive :

Hi Iain,

Did you see this article?
Do you think that if the Tories do it in the UK then the LNP might support similar here?


Having read the piece that Lin links to I can appreciate the dilemma faced by the UK government. Do they fight tooth and nail on the principle that Jihadists should not be in anyway endorsed or do they make a tactical decision to settle the claim and protect the confidentiality of intelligence documents that would be compromised by a protracted legal process?

As abhorrent as I find the idea of giving released Jihadists  any cash at all I suppose it is the lesser of the evils here and in the end many difficult decisions have to turn on that sort of pragmatism.

Finally in answer to your question Lin I don’t think that the LNP would do the same thing as the Tories quite simply because Australia only has two “veterans” of Club Gitmo and both of them have wisely not tried to sue the government in protest at the consequences of their own  evil acts  and/or stupidity.

Cheers Comrades



Should Hicks be allowed to keep the money from his book?

Ok, just a quicky this morning, hands up all of those who think that Hicks should be allowed to keep the money from his book?

In clause 2d of his plea agreement, Hicks agreed to assign to the Australian government any proceeds he may be entitled to, in connection with any publication or dissemination of information relating to the illegal conduct with which he had been charged.

When questioned by the US military commission, Hicks said he understood that the agreement meant he would not “circumvent this assignment to the government of Australia”.

He agreed when it was put to him that if he failed to assign any book profits to the Australian government, it would provide a basis for civil action.

Senator Brandis said the commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions should be taking legal action against Hicks under the Proceeds of Crime Act.

Attorney-General Robert McClelland was last night considering Senator Brandis’s remarks.


Personally I think that every cent of any money Hicks  is given by the publishers for his self-serving book should be forfeited to the crown, in the first instance because he is seeking to profit from his vile  past and secondly because he willingly entered into a contractual agreement with the government to do precisely that.
Cheers Comrades



Hicks not a hero

I suppose it should have been expected that the darling of the Latte Sippers™ would front up on the Q&A program last night , after all he is trying to promote his memoir, No I’m not talking about John Howard I’m talking about the hero of our friends with the milky residue on their top lips…

The wide-ranging interview focused heavily on the more controversial aspects of Mr Howard's tenure. (ABC)

He … received a video question from former Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks, who asked him if he stood by his support of the system that saw Mr Hicks imprisoned for over five years.

A video question from David Hicks in Five Dock, NSW: Hi, I’m David Hicks. When you were Prime Minister you left me in Guantanamo Bay for five and a half years. During that time I was detained without charge for a long time. I was denied a fair trial. I was tortured. Do you believe that I was treated humanely and that the military commission was a fair system? Thank you.

But as with many of his answers the former prime minister held firm on his actions regarding Mr Hicks.

In relation to the military commissions, we put a lot of pressure on the Americans to accelerate the charges being brought against David Hicks, and I remind the people watching this program that David Hicks did plead guilty to a series of offences,” he said.

“David Hicks trained with Taliban, David Hicks was associated with groups that were behaving in a manner that was completely opposed to the interests of this country, and the idea that we should see him as a hero is very misplaced.”

What our Latte sodden friends seem to forget is that Hicks willingly supported one of the vilest regimes in the history of the world, they deeply misogynistic, and Anti Semitic Talliban regime in Afghanistan.On top of that as a captured irregular combatant he was no civil criminal to whom the concept of habeas corpus ever applied. His status was at best problematical, and he should thank is lucky stars that he did not face summary execution.

I was willing to suggest that Hicks have an opportunity to live out the rest of his life in quiet obscurity on the assumption that he was truly contrite about his crimes and gross errors of judgement but for him to come on to the Q& A program and omit any suggestion that he was the author of his own fate in his question suggests that maybe he does not deserve the benefit of any doubt after all.
Cheers Comrades

%d bloggers like this: