Iain Hall's SANDPIT

Home » Leftism » Anti- Semitism » Now that the ceasefire Gaza is holding please consider

Now that the ceasefire Gaza is holding please consider

It is also of no small importance that this manual belongs to the Shuja’iya Brigade. The IDF fought a major battle in the neighborhood of Shuja’iya, which had been turned into a terrorist stronghold. The discovery of this manual suggests that the destruction in Shuja’iya was always part of Hamas’ plan.

It is also of no small importance that this manual belongs to the Shuja’iya Brigade. The IDF fought a major battle in the neighborhood of Shuja’iya, which had been turned into a terrorist stronghold. The discovery of this manual suggests that the destruction in Shuja’iya was always part of Hamas’ plan.

In a portion entitled “Limiting the Use of Weapons,” the manual explains that:

The soldiers and commanders (of the IDF) must limit their use of weapons and tactics that lead to the harm and unnecessary loss of people and [destruction of] civilian facilities. It is difficult for them to get the most use out of their firearms, especially of supporting fire [e.g. artillery].

Clearly Hamas knows the IDF will limit its use of weapons in order to avoid harming civilians, including refraining from using larger firepower to support for infantry.

The manual goes on to explain that the “presence of civilians are pockets of resistance” that cause three major problems for advancing troops:

(1) Problems with opening fire
(2) Problems in controlling the civilian population during operations and afterward
(3) Assurance of supplying medical care to civilians who need it

Lastly, the manual discusses the benefits for Hamas when civilian homes are destroyed:

The destruction of civilian homes: This increases the hatred of the citizens towards the attackers [the IDF] and increases their gathering [support] around the city defenders (resistance forces[i.e. Hamas]).

It is clear that Hamas actually desires the destruction of homes and civilian infrastructure, knowing it will increase hatred for the IDF and support their fighters.

source

The truth is often far from pretty Comrades

NoSharia-NoJihad

 

Advertisements

14 Comments

  1. Richard Ryan says:

    The Zionists must kill every Palestinian male child and female to stop future terrorism—the law of the jungle, this is the only way—kill them all. Exterminate the lot, problem solved.

  2. GD says:

    Pat nails it with the current Arab/Israeli conflict. If a ‘progressive’, ie leftard, can refute his argument, please tell us why he is wrong.

    I doubt you can without resorting to either abuse or head-in-the-sand excuses.

  3. Iain Hall says:

    Sadly we already have too many haters of “the Jews” here in this country:

    A shocking hate crime in Sydney as a group of thugs stormed a bus of Jewish students, making anti-Semitic slurs and death threats. #9News— Nine News Sydney (@9NewsSyd) August 6, 2014

  4. SockPuppet says:

    There are two sides to this Jews and Raghead conflict going on in the desert strip of Gazza being the Jews and the Ragheads. And I will make my comment on it that is as here:

    I know a bloke called Gazza too (he is my brother Gary but we call him Gazza the one who has a business picking out the good stuff from peoples hard rubbish throwouts on there nature strips – its booming) and Gazza says about this Gazza conflict this:

    “Taking sides between the Jews and the Ragheads is like taking sides when Collingwood plays Carlton play. You want both sides to lose and both of them to get obligerated.”

    I think Gazza has nailed the Gazza issue once and for good.

  5. SockPuppet says:

    My brother Gazza has called in (on hes way to the tip to sort through todays rubbish) to add another cuttingedge take on the Gazza conflict. He says its also:

    “Trying to decide which side is worse, Jews or Ragheads, is Like trying to decide which one is worse cancer aids or elbow disease.”

    He has done it again.

  6. GD says:

    There are two sides to this Jews and Raghead conflict

    I remember being castigated previously for using the term “raghead”. I’m glad to see that it’s now acceptable.

    Yes, Sock, there are two sides to this conflict. One is that Hamas wants to destroy, obliterate Israel and kill every Jew. The other is that Israel has no choice but to defend itself. If Hamas stopped firing rockets at Israel that would be the end of it.

    Israel has the capacity to wipe-out so-called Palestine, yet merely retaliates to match the Hamas attacks. Of course Israel shouldn’t. But what should Israel do as Hamas continues with its charter to wipe Israel off the face of the map?

    Stand back and let Hamas bomb the sh*t out of Israel?

    It is in Hamas’ charter to destroy Israel. Iain’s post clearly shows that.

  7. GD says:

    Hamas has no intention of negotiating peace with Israel. Hamas’ aim is to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth.

    How leftards can support such a mentality is beyond me.

  8. SockPuppet says:

    I did not know you are a Jew GigGuy. You mus be one because why else would you care if the Jews are killed?

  9. SockPuppet says:

    I remember being castigated previously for using the term “raghead”. I’m glad to see that it’s now acceptable.

    I have preformed another technical mirracle GigGuy and put “raghead” in a comment search at Chez Halls admin page for comments and found all your comments with “raghead” in them. Lots of them. But no one castrated you for saying it.

    i only borrowed the term from you to make you feel less angry at my who-gives-a-fuck-if-the-Jews-and-the- ragheads-arabs-kill-each-other-position. Well the position that Gazza gave me. I dunno if its acceptable to say “raghead” but I would not call Mustafa at the caraven park a “raghead” (even though hes wearing one now over in Syria) I call him a shithead because he rooted Laura without paying and then took off for bloody Jihad.

  10. GD says:

    That’s funny, Sockpig. I’m sure I got told off for using ‘raghead’. Probably by Craigy and that lot. I do remember Craigy castigating me for using the term ‘shithead’ in relation to Middle Eastern muslims, but apparently that’s ok now, thanks, Sockman. It’s hard to keep up with the latest ‘offensive’ words, especially since Section 18c is still law.

    Does Section 18c apply to this guy?

    btw mate, I’m not Jewish.

  11. SockPuppet says:

    It is okay to call anyone a shithead GigGuy and I do not believe you would get castrated for that. I dunno what the bloke in the video is saying that is racist but you are allowed to try to take action as much as the next guy I reckon (even though you are not a Jew).

  12. richard ryan says:

    I Is the CIA a Terrorist company?

  13. richard ryan says:

    The sobbing and wailing coming from broken hearted bigot, Bolt’s blog, on hearing the right to be a bigot has been put on the back burner, is sweet music to my ears.

Comments are closed.

Welcome to the Sandpit

I love a good argument so please leave a comment

Please support the Sandpit

Please support the Sandpit

Do you feel lucky?

Do you feel lucky?

%d bloggers like this: