Iain Hall's SANDPIT

Home » Blogging » Guess Who

Guess Who

Click for source

Cheers Comrades


  1. Wag says:

    I heard Hicksy was going to be best man at Kerrimys forthcoming nuptials.

  2. Iain Hall says:

    Jeremy 4 August, 2011 at 12:54 pm |

    Yeah, there was a similarly stupid comment from a long-banned troll this morning:

    Over at his blog Jeremy says:

    “Just imagine you endorsing a self-admitted terrorist sympathiser like David Hicks, who would have picked that one? 😆
    I bet you have an autographed copy of his book in pride of place next to your favourite games…”

    Yeah, believing in the rule of law is equivalent to “endorsing” David Hicks’ political views of ten years ago.

    The funny thing is, the buffoons who like the idea of locking Hicks up and making up a crime afterwards to try to punish him and then after imprisoning him without a workable charge for over five years offering him the choice of stay in Guantanamo in limbo for even more years or cop a plea to a bullshit made-up charge afterwards – those people have a lot more in common with the authoritarian Islamic dictatorships than they realise. Those dictatorships don’t believe in the primacy of the rule of law, either.

    Jerzza mate, there is the law, and there is Justice now while most Aussies think that Hicks should be able to “move on” from his past sins they also think that he should not make a quid from them either. Read his letters and its very clear what he was into and the idea that he can make money from learning to kill infidels in anyway shape or form is more repugnant than than any of the legal technicalities that You wish to cite.
    Further I reject absolutely you contention that he should have been the subject of civilian law when he was in fact a captured irregular combatant and eligible to be detained for the duration of hostilities without any criminal charges ever being pursued.

  3. Ray Dixon says:

    So he says you’re a “banned troll” but then he quotes the comment you left (without attributing it) and then he replies?

    F….k me drunk.

  4. Iain Hall says:

    It is rather poor form isn’t it?
    My comment was really just a bit of sarcasm and the endorsement that I refer to is that Jezza clearly suggests that Hicks should be able to make money from his Jihadi past, not that he endorses Hicks taking up Jihad.

  5. Ray Dixon says:

    It’s stupid. If he doesn’t want your comment on his blog, why quote it? … and then reply to it?!!? That’s just plain weird.

  6. Iain Hall says:

    That’s Jezza for you Ray 🙂

  7. Richard Ryan says:

    David Hicks had been in legal limbo for years, at the Yanks pleasure, it’s interesting to note that the Nuremberg trials of German Nazi Party officials charged with war crimes after World War 11 were predominantly completed by late 1946, less than 18 months after the war ended. The Americans were humiliated through their invasion of Vietnam, and will be again with this political trial of Hicks on Australian soil, this will be a God send to David Hicks, let us hear the other side of the story, what are the clayton American flag wavers afraid of here. ALL the way with the USA—-NO WAY, The USA does not speak for me. Shalom.

  8. Iain Hall says:

    Crikey Richard that Is a big comment for you!

  9. Richard Ryan says:

    Here is more! Imagine if the assets of the Murdoch press were frozen——-Bolt would have a mass hysteria blackout.

  10. Ray Dixon says:

    It ain’t gonna happen, Richard.

  11. Richard Ryan says:

    Ray! They grounded Virgin Airlines—-why not the Murdoch Press. I will leave it in your hands, for an idea to stop the press .

  12. Ray Dixon says:

    an idea to stop the press

    Military coup? Terrorism? Dictatorship?

  13. Luzu says:

    Double R,

    It was Tiger Airways that was grounded.

    How would you have dealt with Hicks and the others captured in similar situations?

  14. Richard Ryan says:

    I like character assassination myself——play them at their own game. They hate that.

  15. Ray Dixon says:

    So RR is from PP then?

  16. Richard Ryan says:

    Ray! Anything is better then a twat twitter.

  17. Ray Dixon says:

    So it’s a TT, RR, not a PP?

    Yes, this is all making sense now …. to someone I guess.

Comments are closed.

Welcome to the Sandpit

I love a good argument so please leave a comment

Please support the Sandpit

Please support the Sandpit

Do you feel lucky?

Do you feel lucky?

%d bloggers like this: