Iain Hall's SANDPIT

Home » Domestic life » Lacking the balls to be callled a man

Lacking the balls to be callled a man

This story just makes me mad , this person is not by any stretch of the imagination a man. “he” is a woman who is pretending to be a man , “he” has had “his” body mutilated and chemically altered so that it exhibits some male chatacteristics. But the fact that a child grows in the uterus that “he” was born with makes false any claim that this person is a man.

What we have here is a freak show courtesy of the surgeon’s knife and a silly attention seeking woman’s vanity, nothing more.

disgusted for the sake of the unborn child Comrades

😡


8 Comments

  1. PKD says:

    You know Iain there are many instances in Nature where animals change sex as adults (usually from male to female). So don’t think a sew-swap is limited to us humans – or homosexuality for that matter. Admittedly we have to get the chemicals and procedure administered whereas say a parrotfish can change sex all on its own.

  2. PKD says:

    BTW – I forgot – the point of my post is just to say that changing sex is not a freak show at all given it does occur in nature. And I also doubt that anyone undergoes such a drastic procedure to willingly ‘join the circus’. People do it because they feel fundamentally that they are the wrong gender to begin with.

    Just like people don’t ‘choose’ to be gay either Iain – they simply are. Its not a lifestyle choice…

  3. Iain Hall says:

    You know Iain there are many instances in Nature where animals change sex as adults (usually from male to female). So don’t think a sew-swap is limited to us humans – or homosexuality for that matter. Admittedly we have to get the chemicals and procedure administered whereas say a parrotfish can change sex all on its own.

    I don’t deny that there are some species that are hermaphrodite nor that some fish spontaneously change from one gender to another at various times in their life cycle but this is in no way analogous to this example of media inspired bullshit. This person is biologically female and fulfilling the imperative for her gender but she pretends to be “a man” mainly for the benefit of the largess of magazines like the “national enquirer” et all and to get attention from daytime TV, and it is that which I object to not what any individual should chose to have done to their body.

    BTW – I forgot – the point of my post is just to say that changing sex is not a freak show at all given it does occur in nature. And I also doubt that anyone undergoes such a drastic procedure to willingly ‘join the circus’. People do it because they feel fundamentally that they are the wrong gender to begin with.

    Yawn!
    I don’t care what adults chose to do with their bodies they can re-model their bodies so they look like Klingons (complete with forehead ridges and bad teeth) for all I care but they fool nobody by pretending that they are actually what they seek to be> We live in age when calling a spade a spade is considered a grave sin and that is all that I am doing here.

    Just like people don’t ‘choose’ to be gay either Iain – they simply are. Its not a lifestyle choice…

    This is actually rather debatable, certainly some people are very definitely gay or straight but there are a lot of people who are rather more ambiguous and for these it often does boil down to a choice of lifestyle.

  4. PKD says:

    This person is biologically female and fulfilling the imperative for her gender but she pretends to be “a man” mainly for the benefit of the largess of magazines like the “national enquirer” et al

    Really? This is all really just some publicity stunt from a desperate attention-seeker rather than someone who genuinely wants to have a child via the only means open to them???

    You actually have any *proof* of that? Or is this just idle speculation?

  5. We’re dealing here with a pregnant woman. It is a pretence for the media to run headlines like “expectant dad” or “pregnant man”.

  6. Iain Hall says:

    PKD
    just do a little research on this person and you will see that she has done it all for the publicity, firstly she is a “gay activist”who has history of seeking publicity for “the cause” and secondly there is the evidence from the fact that this story has got such a run in the media.

    But more importantly on what basis do you consider her to be a man? she has only had her breasts removed and hormone treatment; her genitals and reproductive organs remain as nature indented (otherwise this charade would not be possible) As Mark suggests the offensive thing about this whole business is who the leftist media have bought into the lie that this person is a man.

  7. PKD says:

    But more importantly on what basis do you consider her to be a man?

    Actually I never said anywhere I considered her have completed the sex change process – I was thinking along similar lines to Mark. This persons certainly thinks of them self as being male but biologically its obvious the process hasn’t been finished.

    secondly there is the evidence from the fact that this story has got such a run in the media.

    That doesn’t mean anything on its own Iain. That’d be like saying the SA siblings who had a child out of incest did it purely for the media attention – on the basis that their story got a run in the media. Utter nonsense!

    Regardless of whether they’ve been an activists in the past, it still looks like you’re just making innuendo up rather than any concrete evidence…

  8. Iain Hall says:

    Do the research PKD and then get back to me 🙂

Comments are closed.

Welcome to the Sandpit

I love a good argument so please leave a comment

Please support the Sandpit

Please support the Sandpit

Do you feel lucky?

Do you feel lucky?

%d bloggers like this: