Hmm so much for a caring sharing Labor Party eh?
Who is surprised?
Cheers Comrades
Home » Australian Politics » The Labor shuffle….
Copyright
Portions of any work that are quoted are reproduced on the basis of the "fair dealing for purpose of criticism or review" section 41 of the Copyright Act 1968.
let's look at the Australian Copyright Council's fact sheet on Fair Use:
The Federal Court has stated that “criticism and review” involves making a judgment of the material concerned, or of the underlying ideas. Criticism and review may be strongly expressed, and may be expressed humorously, and need not be balanced. The defence can apply where the criticism or review takes place in a commercial context, such as in published books or newspapers or on commercial television.
However, the court emphasised that the purpose of criticism or review must be genuine. If the person has other motives – especially if these motives involve using the material to make a profit, or using a competitor’s material to
divert customers from the competitor – the fact that they have also engaged in a form of criticism or review is not
enough to prevent the use from infringing copyright
All other content on this site is copyright Iain Hall and may not be reproduced in any form with out explicit permission of the author.
Comment Copyright
Anyone who comments at the Sandpit under a pseudonym does so on the clear understanding that by doing so they are giving any and all rights and ownership of those comments to the site-owner who may reproduce them in any form or at any other site or venue entirely at his own discretion.
Blog at WordPress.com. / Theme: Academica by WPZOOM.
So who should we take the $375 mill from Iain? What was it about charity and home again?
Deknarf
I actually don’t disagree with the notion that we should prioritise the needs of this country over others, however the point of this post is to highlight the way that Labor tried to do that in an underhanded and sneaky manner. It just goes straight to the ongoing issue of their credibility and trustworthiness.
So the chickens come home to roost. It’s laughable isn’t it. Labor
promises millions in foreign aid (which it hasn’t got) in order to gain
a temporary seat on the UN Security Council and then has to pull back
the funds (which it hasn’t got) to fund its open door, come one, come
all refugee policy.
What other programs will Labor have to curtail in order to pay for this
profligate influx of welfare dependent, and possibly socially
unacceptable, economic migrants?
What other worthy programs will be curtailed to pay for the ‘Education
Revolution’ which gave some schools an outdoor awning while other
schools wait for air-con and heating?
What other worthy programs will be curtailed because Labor has already
spent the money on misguided ‘initiatives’ and failed ‘green schemes’?
This fifth year of Labor’s mismanagement will be a telling one, as it
becomes obvious that Labor has tied itself in knots attempting to be all
things to the Leftist ideal, while actually delivering nothing other
than symbolism, misandrist rants and the largest debt ever incurred by
an Australian government.
And the two side of politics don’t play the same type of games? C’mon Iain, none of the parties in parliament today have any credibility and trustworthiness.
It just comes down to who’ll do the least damage to the economy and the populace of this country and we both have different views on that one, don’t we?
Of course I won’t deny that both sides have tried this sort of nonsense but on this occasion the Labor party that have been caught out in this little shell game. Which is why I criticised them.