
fun by the sea
The other day our regular commentator here Craigy made a comment about the Sunshine coast and the way that it is developing.
“… It works better that way. Much better than what we presently have.”
When? How?
Ray, the Sunshine Coast has been in trouble since well before Qld’s current problems.
The Greens support sustainable environmental tourism over building more high rise tourist traps. If the Sunshine Coast goes the way of the Gold Coast, as it is now, it will just become a large ghetto (as parts of it have already).
As the hotels get older, and there isn’t enough money to keep up appearances, the over developments become shabby and people stop coming, which is how it is going as we speak. The developments destroy the natural beauty that attracted people in the first place.
Places that embrace sustainable tourism, that respects the environment, are being recognised world wide as the way to go for the long term benefits of full time employment and economic sustainability.
Queensland has always been the state for a fast buck and many places are suffering as a result. With small hotels going bust, large hotels and resorts empty and thousands of floodplain building sites un-sold, things are grim for regular workers on the Sunshine Coast.
But hey, let’s just keep voting for conservative Christians and keep ringing out every last bit of gravy for the wealthy few, while the coast is buggered by over development, it worked on the Gold Coast, didn’t it?
Craigy
To my mind where he goes wrong is that he sees the Sunshine coast only in terms of tourism when the reality is that the vast majority of people who are there at any one time are not in fact tourists at all they live there all year round. and it is these people who are driving the style and nature of the the urban development in that part of Queensland. So I will argue that the tendency to high rise building is more about people wanting to live near the beach than it is about people wanting to holiday at the beach. Once you take in that salient fact the notion of “environmental tourism” can be seen as a nonsense when to comes to the Sunshine Coast. It was a nonsense even when I was a young chap and we would go to the those beaches on day trips and its a nonsense now .
As Ray suggests the Greens have no idea at all about business, especially tourism, because if they are honest they would just come out and say that their belief in AGW means that no one should fly or drive to a holiday away from home as it just adds too much to GHG emissions. They may talk about “eco-tourism” but by its very nature this has to be a restricted elitist activity that only allows very small number of people to access those “pristine places” lest they be sullied by “unclean” humans. So for a business to be based upon this sort of tourism it has to be able to charge a very high price per visitor to cover costs and make a profit.
I am by no stretch of the imagination that keen on urban landscapes even when they are by the seaside and the Sunshine Coast does not do much for me , However like Craigy I have family that live there and over the years I have probably spent much more time there than he has. Heck I even lived there for some months when my daughter was first born ( in a flat owned by my Mother in law that was only a 100m from the beach ) so I’ve got a pretty good “feel” for the place. While I don’t think that it will ever be as sleazy as the Gold Coast it is catching up fast in terms of urban density and that means that those who do decide to holiday there are not going to be the mung-bean travellers who want to pretend that they are visiting some fantasy paradise (at grossly inflated prices) they are people from the urban heartlands of the south who want to enjoy all of the comforts that they are used to (hot and cold running Lattes, booze and sex) in a different setting. Strangely enough most of the international tourists want this sort of experience as well so that is precisely what the business there offer.
Its the way that the world works.
Cheers Comrades
