Is the continued existence of indigenous drunks a good measure of the success or failure of the intervention?

On Planet Latte if you don’t perform the miracle of performing a 100% cure to a problem then what you have done has “failed”. This precisely the mindset that is very much in evidence in the Age piece by Lindsay Murdoch.

In a report to the NT government, Mr Beadman said bush communities are concerned about drinkers being squeezed into the unsafe, unhygienic camps, which were usually on the edge of alcohol-free areas many kilometres from facilities. ”Anyone who has moved around the bush will have seen the mountains of cans and bottles.”

Mr Beadman, a senior administrator of Aboriginal policy since 1973, said bush families were worried that ”not even the governments which make the laws that inadvertently create these places have any duty of care about the consequences of their actions”.

”It is these more-affected people – the ones needing more help – who are now further removed from support as a consequence of the prescribed areas,” he said.

Here at the Sandpit I have been a long time supporter of the intervention in the NT, not because I am concerned about the drunks but because I am concerned about the women and children in indigenous communities.  It may well be less than ideal for the slaves of the grog but is this new paradigm not achieving a safer home environment for the women and children?

As I remember it the aim of the intervention was to benefit the women and children being abused and neglected because of the idle and the drink sodden. There is clearly an associated problem of just how to address the drinkers but that problem does not mean that the intervention is a failure only that it was always only ever going to be a starting point for fixing the problems in our indigenous communities. There is no easy and quick cure for any sort of addiction before the intervention these addicts had a problem and they still have a problem now.

Cheers Comrades

 

 

Work won’t set this one free either

Anders Hoegstroem, 34, who originally faced up to 10 years behind bars, in November struck a plea bargain by admitting his role in the theft before the case reached court. On Thursday, a court in the southern Polish city of Krakow, accepted the 32-month prison term agreed in the plea bargain. "He will serve the sentence in Sweden, in accordance with an agreement with Swedish justice authorities," Polish court spokesman Rafal Lisak told AFP after the court announced its verdict. "He will be transferred to Sweden immediately after the verdict becomes binding in seven days," Mr Lisak said. The theft of the sign from the site of the World War II death camp created by Nazi Germany in Oswiecim, southern Poland, sparked outrage in Israel and was strongly condemned in Poland and Germany as well as by the Jewish Diaspora around the globe.(click for story link)

Though I do suspect that he will have a far better prison experience than those whose memory he violated ever did…

Is 32 months enough?

Cheers Comrades

Buying an Heir, an old man’s folly?

Today I want to consider the story of how one aging and rather well off homosexual couple have bought themselves a baby, Yep I’m talking about Elton John’s use of some poor (well she was until the cheque cleared) hapless American woman to carry a child for him and his partner David Furnish.

The decision to become a father appears to be another grotesque act of selfishness from Sir Elton who, along with his partner David Furnish, has bought a baby son from a surrogate mother in California for a reputed £100,000

Let me make my position clear. I am a gay man and I believe same sex couples should be allowed to adopt or have their own children — although I think that in ideal ­circumstances a child should be brought up by a mother and father.

I have two very good male friends who are in a civil partnership and have adopted a little girl. They will make wonderful parents not least because they are absolutely ­committed to each other, but also because one of them has given up his job to be a full-time parent.

So what of Sir Elton? In many ways, he is to be admired. He has spent millions of pounds of his own money on his Aids foundation. He has successfully battled against drink and drug addiction.

The warm public reaction to his civil ­partnership with David Furnish underlined his status as one of ­Britain’s most popular singers. He still tops the charts after a career spanning four decades.

But he is also an ageing, ­pampered, self-indulgent millionaire — look at the absurd names he and Furnish have given the poor child, for ­heaven’s sake!

And it is the nagging suspicion that Elton — a man who is by nature an obsessive — has simply acquired a son to satisfy his latest fixation that I find repellent.

Forget the media circus that will ­surround this poor little rich boy for the rest of his life.

What really ­disturbs me is the selfishness of a world where it’s apparently ­acceptable for women in their 60s to pay for expensive IVF or for ­superstars who, in a parody of ­consumerism, ‘buy’ children from ­African orphanages as they think the normal rules don’t apply to them.

In my humble opinion there is something rather less than savoury about the notion of paid surrogacy  or the way that the rich and famous “adopt”  poor  waifs from the third world  because  it gets rather too close to the purchase of a human being as if they were just a pet for my liking. Oh I’m sure that its “legal” but is it moral to use a cheque book to buy an Heir? I somehow think that this is the beginning of a saga that won’t end well.

Cheers Comrades

The “Religion of Peace” still upset about being mocked by those Cartoons…

Its hardly surprising that yet another plot to attack the freedom speech that we in the more civilised nations on the planet think is so important. Personally I think that the rage and anger exhibited by followers of the “religion of peace”, just because unbelievers dared to mock their prophet is a sign of a deeply insecure Muslim Diaspora.

Among those arrested Wednesday was a 44-year-old Tunisian national, a 29-year-old Swedish citizen born in Lebanon and a 30-year-old Swedish citizen whose origin is unknown.

The fourth person arrested in Denmark was an Iraqi asylum seeker, believed to be aged about 26 years.

Meanwhile, Swedish security police (SAPO) in Stockholm arrested a 37-year-old Swedish citizen of Tunisian origin.

SAPO head Anders Danielsson said in a yesterday: “A serious terror crime in Denmark has been thwarted through an efficient and close cooperation between PET [Danish security police] and the [Swedish] security police.”

The PET said the attack was due to be carried out within the next few days.

Authorities seized items during the arrests including plastic strips that can be used as handcuffs, a gun with a silencer and live ammunition.

Scharf said that the suspects could be described as “Islamic militants” with links to international terror networks.

Top marks to the police and security agencies who have thwarted what could have been a terrible atrocity, but what odds can I get that there will be a chorus of Latte sipping voices suggesting that those arrested are just “misunderstood” and that we in the west should be more accommodating to the “sensitivities” of those poor Muslims who have been so upset by a few cartoons?

I am all for tolerance and diversity but when the intolerant seek to intimidate to tolerant with guns and  engines of destruction we can’t just keep pretending that being accommodating to such thuggery is any kind of option. Sadly I think that Denmark no longer has a capital sanction for this sort of crime, because I can’t help thinking that only the rope is an apt punishment for those who would commit such a crime.

Cheers Comrades

Bogans vs Latte Sippers

There is an upside to reading the Fairfax press at this time of the year and that is the simple fact that most of the “usual suspects” are enjoying some holiday time so the “b” team are called in to fill the void. fortunately for more sceptical readers like yours truly this can be a very lovely experience that brings us little gems like this OP ed piece from Brigid Delaney:

 

'While the bogan may make headlines with glassing attacks in a city nightclub, drink for drink the intellectual has a bigger alcohol problem.'

The junior intellectuals deeply resent the older intellectuals who took all the good jobs – the staff writers, tenured academics, the Booker Prize-nominated author, the film reviewer for The Monthly.

Under each junior intellectual’s bed is a heavily highlighted copy of Mark Davis’s Gangland, about how baby-boomer intellectuals hog the cultural, academic and media landscape.

This does not happen in Boganland, where the old bogans are more generous to the young, passing on their taxi licence or KFC franchise.

But the differences go deeper than this. While bogans are entertained by weeping illegals being detained on Border Security and receive their news from the hidden cameras of Today Tonight, there is nothing an intellectual looks forward to more than Monday nights. Then they don’t just sit in a dark, cold terrace house watching TV on their Macbook; they are in 7.30ReportLand# where people just like them receive the weekly talking points.

On Monday night it’s The 7.30 Report, Australian Story, Four Corners, Media Watch and then the biggest kahuna of them all – Q&A, for which they turn the sound down and read Twitter: “Malcolm Turnbull looks WRONG in a leather jacket” or ”Can Chris Berg pls sing Lady in Red – LOL”.

Now you can knock me down with a feather if this is not the most perfect description of the likes of our Learned friend and so many of his Latte sipping cronies. Resentment and disdain for the “great unwashed” has never died out with the decline of the upper class aristocracy  its purveyors have just sprouted Che Tee shirts and pockets bulging with I phones, Greens party literature, fashionable consumer electronics and either an air ticket or a frequent flyer cards. Yep those poor deluded fools think that they are so morally superior yet they never understand just why those they seek to lord it over refuse to give them the respect that our Latte sipping friends are certain the deserve.

Cheers Comrades

 

 

Club Gitmo is here to stay

Even the United States can end up snookered between reality and high minded principles (photo courtesy of a FB friend)

I wrote previously that I found it hard to believe that Obama would ever be able to close club Gitmo and in the dying days of this year it is so clear that I am right to have thought so.

“Are they willing to listen to others in the national security arena that have told us and will tell them and have, quite frankly, told the public that Al-Qaeda recruits young people to do harm, to try to blow up airplanes, to blow up themselves and kill others, they use that as a recruiting tool?”

Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, was in talks that eventually broke off with the White House for a negotiated solution.

Gibbs appeared to acknowledge a draft executive order — previously only mentioned anonymously by officials — to formalise the indefinite detention of some Guantanamo detainees but allow them to challenge their incarceration.

“Some would be tried in federal courts, as we’ve seen done in the past. Some would be tried in military commissions, likely spending the rest of their lives in a maximum security prison that nobody, including terrorists, have ever escaped from,” he said.

“And some, regrettably, will have to be indefinitely detained.”

Jihadists, you can’t just kill them once you have them in custody and when their  country of origin won’t take them back either just what do you do with em? I think that most of  these men are going to be guests at club Gitmo for the rest of their natural lives….

Cheers Comrades

 

 

Things we don’t know – about climate

A really good guest post is to be found at Anthony Watt’s blog at present which really goes to the heart of my own argument about AGW. I post an extract below bit please take the time to read the full piece:

Things we don’t know – about climate

I drafted this article on November 19th, 2010. At about ten that morning the weather channel, which gets its data for Lethbridge, Alberta from environment Canada and thus ultimately from sensors less than ten kilometers from my house, said the temperature was -17C. At that same time, however, the sensors about four feet above my roof reported a temperature of -19.2C.

By coincidence, and again according to the weather channel, the all time record low for November here, -35.6C, was set on that same day in 1921.

The source number for that claim, presumably 32.08F, is actually an interpolation from various agricultural research and military facilities across southern Alberta, because the airport weather station has been moved a few times and many of the source records lost – but it should be obvious in any case that neither the thermometers in use at airports in 1921 nor the processes in place to record temperature supported anything like that level of precision.

So how cold was it here before I left that morning? there’s really no way to know – and how did that compare to 1921? I don’t know that either.

What I do know is that the values shown were averages taken over time; that neither instrument is predictably accurate to even one decimal place; and that the air between the two is of variable depth, variable humidity, in constant motion, and had markedly less than one chance in twenty-two of being at a real average temperature of -18.1C at about 10 AM that day.

So how does this extrapolate to sticking a thermometer into the troposphere to estimate our planet’s near ground air temperature? Well, in total the world has less than one sensor for every sixty thousand square kilometers; about three quarters of them are closely grouped in the United States, western Europe, and the militarily significant part of southeastern Russia; almost none have trustworthy time-of-readings records for more than a few years; most of the records are both short and discontinuous; most of the readings are accurate only within loose bounds; and an unknown proportion of the time series supposedly formed from instrument readings contain unknown interpolations.

There are other sources of information. For example, weather satellites have produced records for perhaps half the earth’s surface since about the mid seventies – but those records too have unknown source errors; may now contain accumulated and largely undocumented differences from the source data; show significant coverage bias favoring areas important to civil aeronautics; and are generally accessible only in the form of time series whose values are derived from real measurements pertaining mainly to the upper troposphere through calculations calibrated against the same ground sensor readings they’re used to extend and correct.

In contrast many of the proxy records are both long and internally consistent – but they don’t help because these are very coarse grained: whether they’re based on isotope decay or tree rings, the best “rulers” these produce are location specific and marked in decadal or century intervals, not globally applicable and marked in seasons or years.

The bottom line on this is simple: I can’t pretend to know the temperature within a few kilometers of my house right now to within a couple of degrees C without making basic scientific errors in everything from measurement and imagined precision to application – and when people like Jones and Hansen announce in all apparent seriousness that the entire earth is now 0.5C degrees warmer than it was during the period from 1961 to 1990 they’re asking us to accept a very precise number on the basis of data that’s much worse than mine and in the face of applicability, measurement, and computational ambiguities that are orders of magnitude greater.

Paul Murphy.

The credulous have accepted the notion of human agency in “Climate Change” for entirely political reasons and to that end they have been acting in an entirely religious and dogmatic manner. Frankly I would love to hear their explanation of just how they can reconcile the clear problem with the basic data that Paul Murphy outlines in his piece with the certainty that they exhibit about what is clearly little more than a handful of unsupportable claims about the climate from all of their Profits* of doom.

Cheers Comrades

*deliberate spelling

Really is this the sort of case that the courts should be dealing with?

I hope that all of my loyal readers have the same sort of warm inner glow that I have this morning, you know now that the the joys and sorrows of the Christmas gathering is over and you can enjoy a day of rest now. Anyway for today I offer a small moral quandary, Do you think that this chap should be prosecuted for swallowing and aquarium fish alive?

 

Cruelty charge: Chris Caswell, 30, is accused of swallowing a goldfish in a pet shop to impress his friends

Chris Caswell apparently asked staff to put the £1.99 guppy fish in a tumbler of water before drinking it.

Off-screen, someone can be heard shouting ‘goldfish down the hatch’ as it disappears.

The 30-year-old, who denies causing unnecessary suffering to the fish, faces a magistrates’ court trial next year.

The RSPCA said Caswell entered a the Petals and Pets shop in Newton Aycliffe, County Durham, and paid for the fish before swallowing it whole.

Experts will now be consulted to examine how much suffering a fish would have endured if it was swallowed.

Really this is the sort of thing that we have seen the likes of “Bear Grills” do in his “Man vs Wild ” show many times over. Personally  I think that this is a most stupid prosecution and a great waste of  public money.

Cheers Comrades


Once more into the fray dear Comrades

I just love this one

Today I go once more into the fray and make a final push towards the the nirvana of shopping happiness, you all know it that time when you can sit down pleased with yourself that every present has been bought and and that everything has been purchased for the  family feasting. Yep its the day for that last minute Christmas shopping and to be honest I actually love doing it.  I love the hustle and bustle of the shopping mall I love the hunt for the perfect gifts for friends and family.

Like everyone who blogs regularly I expect that my musings here will become rather more sparse over the next few days, there is no shortage of things to discuss, just a slight difference in my priorities for the next few days. So I will take this opportunity to wish all of my readers, yes all of them (including the obsessional idiots who think that I am some sort of Anti-Christ :roll: ) a safe, happy  and pleasant Christmas  because as I have said before I like this festival, for the notion of good will, for its notions of altruism, for the acts of sharing and the suspension of hostilities, for its celebration of the solstice, for the fine food shared as a sacrament of love with those that we care about and even with perfect strangers.

Honestly folks just what is there not to love about Christmas?

Ho Ho Ho Comrades

 

The validation process

Our Warminista friends have been rather quiet lately about “runaway global warming’ mainly because their credibility has been shot to pierces over the Cliamategate scandal and the fact that the weather has simply not been playing ball with their dire predictions at all. Nowhere is this more so than in the United kingdom, Europe and North America where we have seen three years of colder than usual winters. Now I expect that warming fools like our resident J(trust me I’m a scientist but I won’t tell you what I am qualified in)M will insist that what we are seeing here is “weather” and that it is not the same as “climate”, well frankly I think that JM is talking out of his over rated (by himself) arse.

Back in November, when the Met Office was still doing its “mild winter” schtick, Corbyn said it would be the coldest for 100 years. Indeed, it was back in May that he first predicted a snowy December, and he put his own money on a white Christmas about a month before the Met Office made any such forecast. He said that the Met Office would be wrong about last year’s mythical “barbecue summer”, and he was vindicated. He was closer to the truth about last winter, too.

He seems to get it right about 85 per cent of the time and serious business people – notably in farming – are starting to invest in his forecasts. In the eyes of many punters, he puts the taxpayer-funded Met Office to shame. How on earth does he do it? He studies the Sun.

He looks at the flow of particles from the Sun, and how they interact with the upper atmosphere, especially air currents such as the jet stream, and he looks at how the Moon and other factors influence those streaming particles.

He takes a snapshot of what the Sun is doing at any given moment, and then he looks back at the record to see when it last did something similar. Then he checks what the weather was like on Earth at the time – and he makes a prophecy.

I have not a clue whether his methods are sound or not. But when so many of his forecasts seem to come true, and when he seems to be so consistently ahead of the Met Office, I feel I want to know more. Piers Corbyn believes that the last three winters could be the harbinger of a mini ice age that could be upon us by 2035, and that it could start to be colder than at any time in the last 200 years. He goes on to speculate that a genuine ice age might then settle in, since an ice age is now cyclically overdue.

Is he barmy? Of course he may be just a fluke-artist. It may be just luck that he has apparently predicted recent weather patterns more accurately than government-sponsored scientists. Nothing he says, to my mind, disproves the view of the overwhelming majority of scientists, that our species is putting so much extra CO? into the atmosphere that we must expect global warming.

The question is whether anthropogenic global warming is the exclusive or dominant fact that determines our climate, or whether Corbyn is also right to insist on the role of the Sun. Is it possible that everything we do is dwarfed by the moods of the star that gives life to the world? The Sun is incomparably vaster and more powerful than any work of man. We are forged from a few clods of solar dust. The Sun powers every plant and form of life, and one day the Sun will turn into a red giant and engulf us all. Then it will burn out. Then it will get very nippy indeed.

 

Weather is to climate in the same way that the one millimetre mark is to the the one Metre mark on a measuring stick, it really is just a matter of “scale” because when you get enough “weather” measurements and consider them together you get climate. Surely this is an uncontentious observation on my part?   You see I can’t get past the fact that despite the claims that “this is one of the hottest years on record” we have experienced a rather cooler and somewhat wetter year here in my part of the world and that I have been consistently seeing reports of record cold temperatures in the northern hemisphere so I wonder just how the “hottest year” claim is arrived at because as far as I understand how averages work if large parts of the planet have experienced extraordinary cold weather this year  then it must be the case that more of the planet has had extraordinarily warm weather  for longer periods than usual  but I have heard no such reports of longer and hotter summers … well at least not enough to balance out the reports of colder and more severe winters

I freely admit my limitations on the science and the maths but I do know that those who make dire predictions and prognostications about the weather and climate require more than just a bit of luck which is why we see most predictions drawn on a scale larger than the seer’s lifetime. That way the prognosticator can safely sell their predictions to the world knowing that they will never have to answer the obvious questions when they are shown by events to have been on the wrong track.

Personally I reckon that the next couple of Christmases will be just as white as the last few in the UK and I base that on nothing more than a sort primal “I feel it in my water“  instinct unlike the sort of assertions we  get from our Warminista friends I admit that I could be entirely wrong and that with humility we all have to accept that the only  true validation of any prediction comes in the fullness of time.

Cheers Comrades

 

Sear smears those who disagree on boats

Jeremy Sear says that anyone who opposes encouraging asylum seekers risking their lives by sailing to Australia in leaky boats lacks compassion

 

Listening to the Pure Poison podcasts, as I confess I have recently on a few occasions, is a most comical exercise. There’s almost an error a minute. I would have written a post earlier about Pure Poison’s many basic errors, but pulling Jeremy Sear up for every one of his errors would be a full time job.

This week’s podcast on the recent Christmas Island tragedy effectively de-legitimises those, like Andrew Bolt, who criticise the federal government and the Australian left for supporting policies which have encouraged people to sail to Australia in leaky boats in order to claim asylum. According to Dave Gaukroger, those like Bolt are “concern trolling”, as their concerns for the well-being of asylum seekers are not genuine.

Sear and Gaukroker then quote with approval a comment from Jack Marx, along the same lines, which basically labels those who share Bolt’s views as bully-like, sadists and xenophobes who hide their allergy to foreigners “behind a sick exhibition of concern for the very lives they couldn’t give two $#@&s about”.

Jeremy remarks that he thinks Marx’s comment is “brilliantly put”. Then another quote is thrown in accusing Bolt of needing to “inject his partisan venom”. Meanwhile, their best attempt to refute Bolt’s view is to assert that re-introducing Howard policies such as the Pacific Solution and temporary protection visas would somehow make Australia an awful place for Australians to live in. Other than that absurd argument, a false suggestion that Bolt is opposing the right of people to apply for asylum and other silly arguments, all they can do is to attack the man by asserting that Bolt doesn’t care about the asylum seekers who died last week.

For a bunch of bloggers devoted to exposing “intellectual dishonesty”, it’s surprising that they don’t even attempt to understand opinions, and instead use illogical arguments and smear those who disagree with them about asylum seekers. 

As Bob Dylan once said: “don’t criticise what you don’t understand”.

Its just not an either or situation anymore.

Faeries, Good or bad?

Its just days till Christmas and why would any one be surprised that that a Pinko feminist at the Age would drag out the hoary old chestnut of the difference between the toys made for boys and girls:

In the run-up to Christmas, toy shops and toy departments of large stores are bursting with stock. There is a frightening segregation between what is meant for girls and what is meant for boys.

In the (pink) girls’ section, there are toy vacuum cleaners, toy ironing boards, entire toy kitchens and life-sized busts on which to apply make-up and brush hair. You can even buy a toy baby’s change table complete with baby wipes and nappies. These toys speak of motherhood, domestic chores and a preoccupation with physical appearance.

In the (blue/khaki) boys’ section, there are ugly looking super heroes, trucks, mechanical robots and all manner of fighting equipment. What are these, if not toys that reflect aggression, power and domination?

The vast majority of toys are gender-specific. Even gender-neutral toys such as jigsaw puzzles are presented with either pictures of fairies and princesses or fighting scenes and vehicles. Children instantly know which toy section they are meant to be in.

Harried parents are frustrated by the ever sharper gender divide forced upon them. But for the considerable majority the sheer tsunami of pinkness is overwhelming.

Having submitted to the power of pink, they throw up their hands in resignation offering a variety of justifications: “But there’s always been a strong gender divide in toys”, “What’s the harm? They’ll grow out of it”, “It was like this when I was young”, “The pink gene is getting stronger”.

Acquiescing to pink culture is to become part of the pink junta that has seized power. Already there is a nascent movement against the pink onslaught, with social enterprises such as Pinkstinks. Its campaign aims to influence marketeers and the media to promote positive gender roles to girls.

Sushi Das

 

Boys and girls are different in the things that they want to play with.and as much as I agree that there is a great deal of useless tat marketed as playthings for our children I just don’t rate the sort of argument put by feminists like Sushi Das that the marketing  for “girlie” toys to girls is some sort of patriarchal conspiracy to subordinate women. To some extend we have a chicken or egg situation here and the toys would not be made if there was not a demand for them and of course the same goes for the boy focused lines on the shops shelves as well. gender roles are not, as many feminist would argue, entirely “constructed” there is a very big part of them that are entirely innate in the individual children. So I’m going to suggest that the reason that girls toys are often  all about Fairies and Princesses and boys toys are about machines and guns is that there is part of the female psyche that wants to be a magical fairy princess and there is a part of the male psyche that wants to be a warrior or  a mechanic  and naturally the toys offered reflects this.  However this does not mean that we have to give our children the message that such roles are all that they have to or can be. We are constantly told that to succeed in the modern world we all have to  be versatile and intellectually flexible so surely it follows that our children can enjoy the toys that their nature drives them to desire

On the planet of feminists its all a conspiracy but in the real world our upcoming cohorts of girls and boys can be multifaceted individuals who enjoy the playthings that they innately desire and as long as we as parents allow and acknowledge that our children can do anything with their lives and that the girl who plays with dolls  may well grow into a young woman who wins a Nobel prize for science and the boy who plays with toy soldiers  may spend part of his life raising and nurturing his children . Its just  not an either or situation anymore.

Cheers Comrades

 

“Senate vote yesterday that will allow gay men and women to serve openly in the US military for the first time.”

Some of my critics seem to think that because I don’t support homosexual unions being called or considered a Marriage in  law means that I am in some sense unsympathetic to the desires of homosexuals to be accepted as fully functional members of society or that they should be able to live their lives unaffected by discrimination. Well I just want to say that I am very pleased indeed that the “Don’t ask  don’t tell” hypocrisy has been ended by a successful vote in the US Senate.

The bill to repeal 'don't ask, don't tell' went through easily, in spite of opposition from some senior Republlicans. Photograph: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Gay rights activists and liberals were celebrating after a surprise Senate vote yesterday that will allow gay men and women to serve openly in the US military for the first time.

Democrats, supported by eight Republicans and two independents, voted by a higher-than-expected 65 to 31 in favour of repeal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, the messy compromise introduced during the Clinton years.

One of the main campaign groups, the Servicemembers Legal Defence Network, described reform as the “defining civil rights initiative of this decade”.

Opponents of the bill’s repeal, such as the socially conservative Family Research Council, described the vote as “a tragic day for our armed forces”.

Tony Perkins, the Family Research Council’s president, said: “The American military exists for only one purpose – to fight and win wars. It has now been hijacked and turned into a tool for imposing on the country a radical social agenda.”

The vote gives an unexpected end-of-year boost to Barack Obama, who campaigned in 2008 on a promise to repeal don’t ask, don’t tell, in which gay people could serve in the military as long as their sexual orientation remained secret.

This is a great day for equality and a recognition that those who serve their country and risk their lives in harms way all deserve our respect and support no matter what rocks their jocks .

Cheers Comrades

A damn fine explanation of why “integrating” Islamic immigrants is so difficult.

This way of starting with a short leash is actually very normal in our Western way of raising children. We start with strict expectations concerning school, doing homework, and behaving properly. Then, as children get older and more mature they will receive more freedom from their parents. When they are 21 years old they are expected to have learned enough to be able to handle life and are free to choose whatever education, partner, religion, life style that they want.

In Muslim culture it is different – especially for the boys. They have lots of freedom in their early lives and as they get older more and more cultural/religious restrictions and expectations appear to support the family structure. By the time they are 20 years old, their parents often have already chosen their future wives or husbands. Other choices are also less free: the expectation, for instance, to either achieve high status in education or to work in the little family run shop, to support the family’s reputation by attending Friday prayers in the local Mosque. The “education pyramid” is standing upside down in the West; less freedom in the beginning, more self responsibility as one gets older. In Muslim culture the pyramid stands with its wide end down; few expectations to follow civilized behavior as a boy, and less freedom as one grows more competent, to support one’s own family and religion.

 

by Nicolai Sennels click for full article

I don’t have much to add to this beyond inviting readers to check out the source piece and to give a very big hat tip to Kae’s bloodnut blog
Cheers Comrades

 

In the Age of all places

The Age has become a site devoted to promoting the Greens over recent times and this has meant that it has been at best running dead on the asylum seeker issue or more generally down playing the issue so I found the recent pieces rather interesting insofar as they are actually critical of the government and they don’t suggest that every “asylum seeker” is genuine or that they are allfleeing for their lives“.

 

A survivor after helping to identify bodies.

AUSTRALIA’S immigration detention system is being clogged by growing numbers of rejected asylum seekers who should be sent home, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees has warned.

UNHCR regional representative Richard Towle said Australia needed to better handle an increase in people being assessed as not needing international protection.

”You’ve got large numbers of people now coming through the asylum system in Australia who are not refugees and the challenge is how to find fair and humane and effective ways of allowing them to leave this country to go home,” Mr Towle said

[...]

The deportation of failed asylum-seekers has already been flagged as central to the government’s efforts to stop the boats. Mr Bowen has previously warned that the rejection rate for Afghans, who make up the bulk of asylum-seekers in Australia, is now about 50 per cent.

I think that what a lot of well meaning lefties forget is that coming from a poverty and  corruption riddled shit hole is not actually the required prerequisite  for claiming asylum. According to the convention there has to be a “well founded fear of persecution”,   if 50% are being rejected  and found not to qualify  isn’t it time that this was more widely admitted by those who so vociferously advocate for the people who put their lives at risk in the boats? What is clear though is that for Labor to have any credibility at all on this issue they will have to start putting those claimants who have failed to convince  that they are refugees onto planes back to their home countries. But my guess is that Labor are just so scared of “bad press’ that they just won’t do it. However when you start to see stories like the one I cite today in the Age then that fear of “bad press” may be as unfounded as half of the claims for asylum are.

Cheers Comrades