
When a city has no beach why not build one?
When I was at Southbank yesterday I could not help being pleased to see people of many different ethnicities peacefully sharing the park children of all hues played with each other in and amongst the fountains and splashing water of the beach and the water play area. It was a ringing endorsement for the idea that multiculturalism can work. I was delighted to see that my own children were entirely indifferent to the colour of anyone’s skin or to anyone dressed differently, they just saw that people are individuals.
I only mention this because I have encountered bigotry recently and it has of course been the bigotry from those of the Latte sipping persuasion and they all seem to cluster together around that den of leftard inequity that goes by the name of “Pure Poison” not surprisingly one of the offenders is a chap who sometimes drops in here to have a go at yours truly. He seems to be very keen to insist that anyone who questions the veracity of the claims for asylum is doing so for racist reasons but he is not alone in his hatred of anyone with less than an open door policy on accepting those who want to claim asylum here. Clearly this is a portent of things to come when the question of how many immigrants this country should welcome becomes part of the political discourse.
Mr Morrison said the current population growth rate of 2.1 per cent put Australia ahead of Canada, Britain and the US
“It even puts us ahead of China and India,” he said. “It’s principally fuelled by net overseas migration. A natural increase in the fertility rate has (increased it) but what has been driving the numbers . . . has been spiralling rates of net overseas migration.”
Mr Morrison said the Coalition would support skilled migrants coming, but was likely to cut other elements of the program, including family reunion.
“It’s about getting your immigration policy under control,” he said. “The migration program should be tight and focused on skills and productivity.”
The Opposition Leader last night backed Mr Morrison’s comment that the prediction of a population of 35.9 million was not sustainable, saying the roads of Sydney and Melbourne were already choked.
But Mr Abbott stopped short of committing the Coalition to a cut in migration, saying decisions on the intake should be taken on a “year by year basis”.
“Immigration has to be in Australia’s national interest,” he said on the ABC’s Q&A program last night.
Mr Morrison said the 35.9 million forecast, which Kevin Rudd has endorsed as appropriate, was being driven by net overseas migration well above what it was under the Howard government.
He said average net overseas immigration under the Coalition had been 126,000 a year, but under Labor it had risen to more than 300,000.

This morning I watched the episode of Q&A in which Tony Abbott went solo and for once the ABC seemed to achieve some measure of balance in the studio audience as the applause for and against what Tony was saying attested. he very neatly made the point that we just can not take everyone who wants to come here for a better life and that fleeing a war does not actually meet the criteria to claim asylum here, especially after they have travelled through intermediate countries where they will be free of persecution. He also made the point that we should not lock in any figure when it comes to the numbers of immigrants that we will accept in coming years.
Getting back to our friend who I mentioned earlier, over on the dark-side I posed a series of questions that he seemed unwilling to answer so I will pose them again here:
Oh and the post that you refer to is here.
Of course he and his cronies are typically unwilling to consider the question with any honesty, instead vilifying those of us who want to question the mad rush to make the population of Australia bigger. No one can say for sure what the best number a sustainable population is for this country but it is a question that is better asked sooner rather than later quite simply because the sooner that we decide where we want to be the the better placed we will be to plan for that result.
Open doorers like Damian Doyle annoy me because they are all heart and no head on issues like this. We have a duty to the next generation of Australians to think before we increase on our country’s s population or allow unrestricted right of entry if we want the social harmony that I saw and admired at Southbank yesterday to continue and to be enhanced.
Cheers Comrades