Those Danish Cartoons just keep giving when it comes to showing the world just what a tolerant and modern faith the world has in Islam, well not really But it is actually rather strange that after failing to intimidate the secular governments of Denmark and Europe with the sort of protests (and worse) illustrated below that now there is to be an attempt to sue.

- Angry Muslim protesters march on the Danish embassy in London in 2006 over newspaper cartoons of Mohammed / The Daily Telegraph Source: The Daily Telegraph
NEARLY 95,000 descendants of Mohammed are going to sue 10 newspapers for publishing “blasphemous” cartoons of the prophet.

Artist Kurt Westergaard, whose life has been in danger ever since he drew a cartoon of a bearded, Mohammed-like man with a bomb in his turban / AFP Source: AFP
Faisal Yamani, a Saudi lawyer acting for the descendants, claims that the cartoons – which first appeared in 2005 and caused violent protests by Muslims around the world – are defamatory.
One of the 12 cartoons depicts Mohammed wearing a bomb-shaped turban.
The Sunday Times said that although the cartoons were published by Danish newspapers, Mr Yamani plans to pursue legal action in England, where libel laws are weighted towards the plaintiff.
English lawyers expect that he will argue that the cartoons were published in Britain via the internet and are a direct slur on his clients, who live in the Middle East, north Africa and even Australia.
Mark Stephens, a British lawyer who saw Mr Yamani’s missive to the newspapers, told The Sunday Times: “Direct descendants of the prophet have a particular place within Muslim society … By effectively criticising and making fun of the prophet you are, by implication, holding them up to scandal, contempt and public ridicule.
“The question is, is that defamatory in English law?”

You would expect that the case will be thrown out at the first hurdle quite simply because I don’t think that it is possible under English law to defame the dead but I also think that what ever happens any court hearing will inspire more of the “peaceful”protests that have done so much to cement the notion that Islam is a “religion of peace. Which is of course the point of the lawsuit.
Islam is not the only faith wrestling with the law. The long standing scandal of kiddie fiddlers in dog collars continues to haunt the Catholic church and the crux of their problems seems to me to lay with their longstanding desire to address such problems in house under cannon law rather than throwing offenders out of the clergy and into the arms of the secular courts. The result of this wrong headed response to the problem was to perpetuate the abuse as the abusive priests were just moved around more to avoid scandal to to attain Justice for the victims.
I have repeatedly made my disgust and disdain for anyone who sexually abuses children very clear at this blog and I have been scathing about the way that we deal with these scumbags repeatedly suggesting that society would be a better place if they are excluded from it either by the use of the rope or by imprisoning them for the term of their natural lives. So I was somewhat taken aback by comment that have been submitted by Craig Young AKA “Craigy”.
First he thinks that this is both true and funny enough to submit to my St Patrick’s day post
A Catholic priest, a rapist and a paedophile walk into a bar…
…he orders a drink….
And then he has the gall to make this claim when I refused to allow his comment out of moderation
I have no interest in a blog run by someone who supports child abusers. Just thought I’d see if it was still the case.
The thing is no matter how bad the acts of individuals within the church have been or how bad the omissions and mistakes in addressing that abuse has been (and they have been some rather big mistakes ) I think that it is just as unfair to condemn all catholics or all members of the clergy as it is to condemn all Muslims for the actions of the violent protests and the bomb carrying Jihadists.
Ironically Craigy in the past chided me on the basis of his belief that anything that I write about the Jhadists is demonising all Muslims:
Your point is one many have tried to make here without success. Iain’s complete conviction that all Muslims are evil is simple minded and typical of the right.
#
Now with the changing of just a few words Craigy’s comment above becomes the perfect paraphrase of his position on the Catholic Church
Your point is one many have tried to make here without success. Craigy’s complete conviction that all Catholics are evil is simple minded and typical of the left.
Craigy, like so many of his pals from the left, is taking a great delight it the scandal about priestly sexual abuse because he can use it as a cypher for his hatred of Catholicism and those who follow that expression of Christian faith. This is a bigoted position that is just as vile as the one espoused on the far right who think that any follower of Islam is by definition an evil terrorist.
There is no doubt that the hierarchy of the church is working on addressing this horrible and long standing problem while it is entirely fair to be critical of those who have abused their priestly office there needs to be an understanding that it is not fair to brand all men of the cloth as guilty just because of their vocation as Craigy does. The current Pope appears to be doing something about addressing the problem and only time will tell if things like his pastoral letter and a new willingness to have offenders answer to secular law for their sins will be effective. Personally I would like to see every priest who has abused the trust of his office strung up by his balls (metaphorically speaking) from the nearest lamp post but I know many sincere and pious Catholics who no more deserve to wear the odium of the abusers than the peaceful Muslims deserve to wear the odium of the suicide bombers. Now if only the bigots of the left like Craigy could appreciate that the world would be a better place.
Cheers Comrades
8)