For all of their protestations about freedom of speech and more importantly freedom of thought so many of may friends from the left are constantly embarrassed by the excesses of the Political Correctness crowd, probably because they are forced to defend what is in fact quite indefensible. More and more we see examples of just how the new thought police are trying to force people to comply with their leftist brand of new Puritanism. So we get the sort of Bru Ha Ha that has engulfed Carol Thatcher in the UK over a remark made in private, and this example where a community nurse has tried to offer the solace of prayer to one of her charges and has been made to defend her very livelihood for her compassion .
Community nurse Caroline Petrie offered to pray for an elderly patient who was being treated at home. The following day, Mrs Petrie was confronted over her offer by a nursing sister.
The day after that, she was told that she was suspended while disciplinary action would be taken against her which might lead to the sack.
But although the patient had turned down her offer of a prayer, she said she was not the slightest bit offended and certainly had not made a complaint.
As with Carol Thatcher, it was this nurse’s colleagues who were offended that Mrs Petrie had transgressed codes of ‘equality and diversity’ – which apparently preclude a nurse offering the Christian solace of prayer.
And it was professional colleagues, both in that NHS Trust and in the BBC, who took it upon themselves to enforce those approved attitudes from which there can be no deviation.
Mr Ross’s offence is that in sick language he offended the elderly. Old, white, middle-class people don’t really count for much in the BBC mindset. Ms Thatcher’s alleged offence involved race – which to the BBC constitutes the most heinous crime of all.
Such political correctness is now the governing characteristic of public sector institutions such as the BBC and the NHS, along with an intelligentsia determined upon a draconian process of social engineering aimed at changing not just society but human nature itself.
Ostensibly designed to protect disadvantaged groups, it is actually all about advertising the moral purity of those who enforce it. It’s a dogma enforced with the zealotry of a secular inquisition and is profoundly totalitarian in character. Indeed, behaviour such as this has always been a key feature of police states and totalitarian regimes.
As an atheist I have had people offer me prayers, some to save my soul others offered as a comfort when my mother died. It was never offensive to me, nor was it offensive to the patient that Caroline Petrie sought to comfort. But that does not matter a jot to some ideological atheists out there. I get just as annoyed with the militant atheists as I do with mad Christian Fundies or mad Jihadists. there are simply as many ways to understand the universe as there are minds that can perceive it and it is only those who are so very insecure in their own beliefs that will insist on trying to convince others that theirs is the one true truth or try to sanction the expression a contrary belief.
When ever I have been offered the comfort of prayer my response has been to accept it for the good will, hope and affirmation that it contains even though I have no belief in the supernatural in any shape or form. Because when it comes down to it as a social animal we all need a little compassion from time to time . It can be something as a simple kindly touch , a common platitude or even a prayer.
In a tough and busy world no one should ever be sanctioned for their compassion and desire to help those in need. Now if we could just get my friends from the left to realise just how counter productive the political correctness stuff actually is we may just stand a chance to build a better future for our children.
Cheers Comrades
8)

Tap!
Indeed
This just another example of why you’re better off living in ‘laid back’ Australia instead of ‘uptight’ England, Iain. I doubt that anyone out here – no matter how extreme left they may be – would give a stuff about Petrie’s prayer offer.
I think you need to 2 new tags: “Only in England” & “Who gives a shit”
And a hearty Atheist “Amen” from me too Iain. With all that goes on in the world today, the last thing we need to do is crack down on what few caring individuals we find. If someone wants to pray for me in an hour of need well good on ‘em. It will make them feel better and it is always good news that someone cares about you. Atheist, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Rastafarian it is how we treat our fellow travellers that determines right from wrong. No harm done I say. I am going to home-in on this whole PC thing and debunk it. Where are these committees that decide and dictate this rubbish? How does it find it’s insidious way into our society to the point where we are suddenly shackled but it’s restriction. What is the mechanism by which it is spread. PC be damned! Toughen up Australia. (Britain – you may want to have a collective cup of tea and a lie-down)
It all smacks of George Orwell’s “Newspeak” designed to restrict and contain ideas and protest. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspeak
I think you raise a good point here, Iain…but I suspect the rise in militant atheist which you allude to can be attributed as a response to militant faith – especially that being preached from the Vatican, the Middle East and some parts of the USA.
Of course, if someone offers me a prayer, I would refuse. I don’t see the point and as a political atheist, I would question their motives. It’s certainly not a threat per say, but it is quite insensitive.
I suppose that the point is that what a prayer contains is not just a supplication to the deity but good wishes to you and while you may certainly think the former is worthless who wants to shun the later?
Iain, I really don’t think Australia has a major ‘PC’ problem. Yes, we’ve gone too far in some cases but it’s usually petty bureaucrats who do that. In general life though, there’s been an increase in the use of PC terms but I’d suggest that at the same time there’s also been a corresponding rise in ‘respect for all’.
Politically incorrect talk is still rife in many circles and will probably never disappear from the Australian vernacular. Sometimes when I hear my redneck relatives (by law!) engage in all their redneck/racist talk I really want to serve it up to them. But I’ve learnt that they don’t mean any harm and that they’re just ignorant, so I just ignore it (and them!)
The examples you keep quoting are nearly always from England and, while I agree that it’s PC gone crazy over there, doesn’t the lack of such reports in Australia just prove to you that we don’t and won’t follow suit?
You will follow suit. Just give it time.
I’m not sure what you know about Australians and our culture, Shawn, but over here we tend to call a spade a spade, not a histerectomy.
I agree with you, Iain. But I don’t think you need to pray in order to impart good wishes. I suspect if someone’s incapable distinguishing between the two and acting out the latter, not the former, then they have a problem.
The thing is Reuben , as I see it, you can’t expect that someone else is going to think in those terms, for many sincere and devout believers there is no difference between prayer and the imparting of good will/good wishes. I have spent a lot of time with Christians and I have never refused to respect the saying of Grace before a meal (even saying the invocation myself on occasion) I just sort of think that some of the rituals have an important social function beyond their religious justification. Funerals are a good example The promise of an afterlife is a load of tosh in my opinion but the forms and traditions enable the living to cope with their grief, the rituals give a us a time to cry and a time to make jokes and laugh about the object of our grief. Our lives would be much diminished if we insist upon a dour and mean spirited sort of atheism. So I don’t dis anyone’s beliefs no matter how stupid I think that they are. I have enough confidence in my own religious position that I just do not need to spread the word or shake some one else’s faith to reinforce my own.
Ray,
Do you not have commissions that patrol the internet and everyware else and charge you if you are not politically correct? We have what is called the HRC(human rights commission) and if anybody complains to them they will charge the offender. If you go in front of the tribunal they have a 100% guilty rate. If you spend gobs of money you might be let off before the tribunal gets a hold of you. (sounds like something out of the USSR, just normal liberal behaviour)
I am not making it up when I say I cannot voice my opinion on gay marriage. Anybody can report that and I will be charged. Conservative forums locate outside of Canada to places like Panama so that the HRC cannot force them to give up their membership list to the government.
There are actually people that make a living by going around the internet and reporting people. They will even incite people to make a comment and then charge them.
Of course you will not be charged for insulting Christians or white males but the slightest insult to Muslims is taken very seriously.
Shawn, move to Australia mate, it’s a ‘free for all’ over here. Check out http://www.grods.com the country’s leading leftist website (in my humble opinion). Grods is living proof that you can say whatever you want and stay out of jail in good old Oz, and good on them, they’re a lively bunch, just ask Iain.
Btw, Iain’s site also supports our highly held freedom of speech culture.
The HRC commissions(or like things) are also prevalent in Europe, surprised they are not in Australia. What are your gun laws like? Didn’t they just confiscate the guns?
I am moving this year if everything goes as planned.
I was planning on going to work in the southern US but with the economy I am going to stay in Canada for now.
Btw, Iain’s site also supports our highly held freedom of speech culture.
I can still be charged even if I am on an Australian site.
Shawn, our strict gun laws (not strict enough in my opinion) are part of the reason people here are not afraid to express their opinions. It means there’s less chance that some f*cker will just go out and buy a cheap gun and take their revenge out on you … or on a school full of kids.
I can still be charged even if I am on an Australian site
Well with so many crazy gun-toting rednecks over there I’m not surprised they clamp down on inflammatory comments!
The yanks really have free speech and the right to own guns.
We have gun registration and controlled speech.
A bomb is easy to make and much more effective than a gun.
What are your strict gun laws?
Is anybody allowed to have a gun?
I don’t know our exact legislation on it, Shawn, but it is very heavily regulated and rightly so. In fact you don’t see many gun shops out here, but that might be because there’s not a big market for them anyway.
Although the rednecks are fighting back and trying to start up those big ‘gun expos’ like they have in the States.
(Btw, I’m not sure how a post on PC got diverted onto guns!)