I have been following the controversy about the congregation at Saint Mary’s church with more than a little interest, not because of my own faith position , but because I am fascinated by the politics of the issue.

MARCHING orders ... Rebel Brisbane Catholic priest Peter Kennedy has been sacked by Archbishop John Bathersby.
SACKED priest Father Peter Kennedy said he never wanted to push St Mary’s style of worship on others. His followers vowed to protest on Sunday.
Fr Kennedy predicted 1000 people would turn out for Sunday morning mass in a show of support for him and the St Mary’s community.
At a packed press conference held in the historic church in the afternoon, Fr Kennedy claimed that in the 28 years he’d been at St Mary’s, no-one had tried to impose the St Mary’s style of celebrating the Catholic faith on others.

The different incarnations of the Christianity are really rather like fast food franchises each one has a certain public image and menu and there are no franchises that have a longer history than Catholicism. Thus it is no surprise to me that when one branch office begins to offer deep fried chicken (with all those herbs and spices) rather than the more normal confession burgers ( with a side order of contrition and absolution) that the head office should want to step in and replace the store manger with one who will return the store menu to just what people expect. The essence of any franchise is keeping true to the template. Clearly Peter Kennedy is not doing this.
That is not to say that he has not been doing a good job in his community; in a secular age to have such a supportive and vibrant congregation is something to be admired. The question for comes down to is what he is doing anything like Catholicism any more?
The church teaches that homosexual sex is sinful, and Peter Kennedy ignores this in his desire to be inclusive of his homosexual parishioners.
The church believes that the gender roles within the liturgy should preclude women from the pulpit. This is ignored under Peter Kennedy.
The church believes that only its own iconography should be evident on the grounds of its ecclesiastic real estate, yet under Peter Kennedy’s watch there is statuary that is at least ambiguous enough that it could be seen as a representation of the Buddha.
Now to get back to my fast food analogy if Peter Kennedy were running an independent outfit that he had started from scratch none of the points above would matter but in fact he did not start from scratch and the owners of the brand are right to sack a manger who won’t sell the right sort of food from their store and replace him with one who will.
While some of commentators, from shall we say the far left want to sell this conflict as an example of the will of the people being subverted by the “evil church hierarchy” it is the parishioners who are used by a mob of the usual Socialist Alliance types to ferment trouble within a faith community that they otherwise despise.
Now personally I can’t for the life of me understand why anyone needs any kind of interlocutor between themselves and the deity (of whatever brand they choose) but clearly for many people there is comfort to be found in the shape and the form of a familiar ritual that can be seen in the mass anywhere in the world. It is the same sort of uniformity that makes certain fast food so attractive to hungry travellers the world over.
Peter Kennedy has certainly been pushing the envelope as far as he can the trouble is that the paper has finally torn and as a result any good works that he has presided over are facing uncertainty, not that his socialist pals care about that.
Eat well Comrades
PS while we are on the topic of religion can I ask any readers who have not already done so to take half a minute to do my religion and politics polls in the side bar .