The left are never keen to admit that they support apartied, but under Brother Number One it seems that it is what we should expect if they ratify the UN charter on indigenous rights.
The UN also supports the principle that indigenous people should determine who qualifies as indigenous. It wants their rights enshrined in treaties and agreements between the state and those who define themselves this way. In other words, the UN has endorsed a program that, if introduced in Australia, would revive the entire separatist agenda of Aboriginal politics of the Hawke-Keating era, an agenda that, apart from lucrative positions here and abroad for a select class of tertiary-educated activists, has had no positive outcomes for Aborigines to speak of, and whose awful failings are reproduced with depressing frequency in the reports of one commission of inquiry after another.
Even though the Rudd Government has not yet officially declared its hand, it has already made it clear that action is only a matter of time. It not only endorses the UN agenda in principle but will specifically affirm its support for the declaration to the General Assembly.
After the favourable media response to the apology to the Stolen Generations in February, Foreign Affairs Minister Stephen Smith confirmed the Government was preparing to ratify the declaration. He told the Ten Network he was consulting with stakeholders about reversing Australia’s opposition.
Read the whole thing and see just how the leftist agenda is going to condemn future generations of indigenous children to despair, desolation and buggery.
It is a big worry Comrades
Filed under: Australian Politics, Ethical questions, Federal politics, Indigenous Issues, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Racism, Scams, international politics | Tagged: keith Windshuttle, The UN declaration of indigenous rights
Seeing as how treaties now exist between indigenous people and states around the world, and these have been seen as very successful and positive for those people, how do you think this is going to create the despair, desolation and buggery that you claim it will?
What is the link between treaties and on-going disadvantage in your view?
Why do we have these same problems in broader society amongst disadvantaged communities?
How is supporting the maintaining of cultural links in anyway like apartied or is this just some famous Iain hyperbole?
Windshuttle, as usual, makes no logical sense, you need to think this though a bit more Iain.
`
Which ones have been successful Craigy? and just how do you measure that success?
You are the one talking about treaties, I am merely suggestion that the rights agendas is counter-productive an the UN charter is all about that agenda.
What exactly are you referring too here?Abuse in the wider community? We both know that it is the amount of abuse and neglect and not just the fact that there is some that matters here.Or are you going to claim that the rate is the same ?
Craigy if it was JUST about cultural links there would not be a problem.
I think you will have to do better than just making a vague assertion here, in what way in Keith Windshuttle not being logical?