Firstly dear readers I beg your indulgence for imposing this here. I have previously made such posts protected but my troll is just too stupid to work out a simple password no matter how specific to him and his net persona I make the clues. So just to clear the air and to save him from the misery of not be able to read my response this one is going public.
The blogger known as Iain Hall continues to tell malicious lies about me by claiming that I have threatened his family (I have never done any such thing) and his piss-weak response is to put up password-protected posts that noone(sic) can read. I have given Iain the option of providing evidence of where I have threatened him, either (1) here at Hallwatch, or (2) at his own blog….. but as yet, NOTHING, except for more lies.
I feel that there is no need for me to meet yet another ultimatum from this scumbag, in particular to provide proof of his threats. Especially when the post contains yet another threat as any one can see in the following paragraph. Why provide proof for something that is self-evident?
Iain, put up or shut up. If you continue to tell these lies about me then I might print off some of your crap and stick it in the post to your lovely wife, I might even write up a summary of the blogging history of I. Hall. We will see what she thinks about what you get up to while shes(sic) off making a quid or two. I dont(sic) think she will be too impressed at your attempts to stalk people online, ruin their careers, con 17year olds into tracking down dirt on someone and all of the other crap you have been engaged in.
Your move, numb nuts..
Now I don’t give a toss how many bloggers attack my opinions or pieces that I write in my blog but I do care when lies about me personally are published. There is no greater malicious liar when it comes to the topic of Iain Hall than the troll who posts as “bourbon boy”. Despite repeated and explicit denials from me he continues to insist that I am “on the dole” that I partake in the hobbies of bestiality and buggery ,that I am not a Londoner, that my car is “structurally unsound” and financed from the public purse ect ect ect. Personally I find it sadly and Ironically amusing that he dares to be affronted by anything that I should say about his activities and the threats, both implicit and explicit, like the one he makes in his blog post of last night. There is no reasoning with cyber bullies like this chap, he has no honour and no track record for keeping his word, for instance on an earlier occasion he made the promise that were I to specifically deny being “on the dole” he would cease claiming that I was. I made such a denial and his claims to the contrary did not even stop for one day. It was then that I knew that there was nothing to be gained by conceding anything to nameless scumbags like “bourbon boy”.
I have consulted the police here about his continued personal harassment and my advice is that his activities clearly constitute “cyber stalking” as defined by the act here in Queensland and I have been collecting a file of my own about his “work” on the web this includes screenshots of his WebPages copies of all of the harassing comments that he has tried to post to my blogs ect ect. Now it is only a matter of personal inertia that has kept this stuff in my archive rather than it winging its way to the police.
So I say this to you now “bourbon boy” cease and desist both your threats and your harassment immediately and forever or I will cease to restrain myself from lodging that complaint to the police.
Now I suggest that your next move had better be a consultation with a lawyer boy, because you have threatened blackmail here and that carries the prospect of real jail time.
A response to “My response”
Despite repeated and explicit denials from me he continues to insist that I am “on the dole”
Well if your wife is working “full time” then you probably arent (sic) receieving(sic) the dole, that is obvious…… but I bet you are collecting family payments, so you are still in reciept(sic) of taxpayer funds. But thats(sic) not a problem actually because a lot of needy people collect govt money….. what pisses us all off is that you take advantage of your unemployed status to stalk and threaten and harrass(sic) bloggers. I reckon if you got a job like the rest of us then you would be too busy to carry on with your Im(sic)-the-king-of-the-internet crap.
This claim of yours is entirely based upon empty supposition and yet you sell this supposition as if it were fact when it is nothing more than the fevered imagination of a sodden idiot who can not comprehend that when someone, like myself, actually owns both his house and another one as well, that it is both pointless and unnecessary to work every hour that god gives us merely to buy “stuff” or to be on the consumption treadmill. My wife loves her work and I love and enjoy raising our children, it is called “role reversal” but sexist troglodytes like you seem incapable of comprehending such things. We took the opportunities that life presented us with and have created a sound position in life to raise our children without being absentee parents like so many of your ilk and that is something that we are very proud of.
….that I partake in the hobbies of bestiality and buggery
I have never seriously said that you bugger bottoms or rape farm animals, Hall, I just posted a couple of funny photoshopped pics of you. And anyway, didnt you post a picture of Jeremy Sears being fucked by Kermit the frog? (I still have a copy of that pic btw and I think there is a copy on Grods Corp.) Seems as though you can dish out the accusations of bestiality and buggery but when it happens to you then you squeal like a pig.
The animated Gif of Jeremy Sear which (no” s” on the end of his name by the way), which I did not make and in fact found on the web, was NEVER published by me it was stolen from my photobucket account in the short time that it was open to the public so perhaps you should be harassing Scott Bridges for its publication not me.
…that I am not a Londoner
Youre(sic) not a Londoner, you dont live there, you live in Ocean View, Qld. Even if you were born in London you havent been there since your early years when you were still wetting your strides. You only say youre a Londoner because you think it sounds shit-hot and makes you seem more interesting than you really are.
A Londoner is someone who is born in London. In the same way that an Aussie will still be an Aussie even when they have lived most of their lives in say, London. :roll:
…that my car is “structurally unsound” and financed from the public purse
Hall, your car doesnt(sic) look too stable to me but thats my personal opinion and I am entitled to it. If its stable then why do you drive the freakin thing wearing a helmet?!? As for it being financed from the public purse, if receiving(sic) family benefits allows you to stay at home and you then spend that time working on your Noddy car then as far as I am concerned it IS funded by the public purse.
What you know about cars can in all likelihood be written on the back of a very small postage stamp. My car was financed from the sale of my vintage Norton motorcycle and my collection of vintage bike parts. The Helmet, which has a visor, was for eye protection as no windscreen is fitted to the car, you idiot.
I have consulted the police here about his continued personal harassment and my advice is that his activities clearly constitute “cyber stalking” as defined by the act here in Queensland
You havent(sic) consulted anyone, Iain….. and which act is that exactly?? Please do tell us?
http://members.iinet.net.au/~rabbit/stalklrs.htm
read the link idiot.
I have been collecting a file of my own about his “work” on the web this includes screenshots of his WebPages copies of all of the harassing comments that he has tried to post to my blogs ect ect. Now it is only a matter of personal inertia that has kept this stuff in my archive rather than it winging its way to the police.
Just as you have been collecting a file well so have I…. a file on your behaviour towards Jeremy “Mr Lefty”, one on your behaviour with regard to Bruce and “Monster Truck”, a file on your behaviour to “Bridgit Gread”, a file on your behaviour to “Janine Aussie”, a file on your behaviour to “The Editor” (remember how you posted his birthday and encouraged other people to steal his identity??) For every one thing you reckon you have on me, I have two on you. So you go to the cops, Iain, see what happens when you do.
My “behaviour” towards Jeremy never crossed the line as you constantly do Troll boy, The correspondence between “monster truck” and myself is at worst ambiguous and clearly demonstrates that I repeatedly turned down any offers, by that person, to obtain any information by illegal means. “Bridgit Gread” would have to admit her true identity for her lies to have any substance, Likewise ” Janine Aussie” is another nameless scrotlet. Scott Bridges published his own ”happy birthday to me post” at his blog and my post about that was very clearly and unambiguously a cautionary piece that I repeatedly offered to edit so that his actual birthday was no longer part of the text. In clear and unequivocal terms Scott said that he was entirely indifferent to the publication of his details. But putting all of that to one side that still does not give you ANY valid justification for your continued harassment of me and my family.
Now I suggest that your next move had better be a consultation with a lawyer boy, because you have threatened blackmail here and that carries the prospect of real jail time.
No I havent blackmailed you, I have simply suggested that I might like to share something on the Net with a fellow member of the public. I had a look at Wiki and it says that blackmail is:
…..the act of threatening to reveal information about a person, or even do something to destroy the threatened person, unless the blackmailed target fulfills certain demands. This information is usually of an embarrassing or socially damaging nature.
You really are seriously deluded about the law aren’t you? But so too are many of the other scrotes doing their porridge.
Now Iain I ask you this….. how could sharing something you have written and published online in a PUBLIC blog be “embarrassing or socially damaging” if I gave it to your wife?? The answer is that she doesnt know what you post on the Net. No wonder youre(sic) friggin embarrassed. The reality is that I would never post you or her anything but I quite like the fact that you have let something slip here.
My wife is a most sensible woman who would regard an anonymous poison pen letter about her husband as something to report to the police. But I notice you have been furiously back-pedalling over at Grods about sending such a letter in any case. So Now that you retreat from your attempt to blackmail me into submission about the truth of your threats, both explicit and implicit, I suggest you to cease and desist making any further threats to either my family or myself.
My wife does read my blog by the way.
Finally you may think that every spelling error of mine that you find is some kind of victory of enough consequence to justify a post at your putrid blog but consider how much of a looser does it actually makes you look when that is all you have? You should perhaps consider a bit more attention to your own orthography because there are often many more errors in your own writing than there ever is in mine, as the number of “(sic)s “ I have added to the quotes above testify.
I may loathe the politics of, Sear, Everett, Bridges and Gread, but at least they are worthy of some measure of respect because they do have a political opinion and argue from honestly held beliefs . But what do you have? What do you believe in apart from a persistent and petulant desire to harass me? Nothing, nowt, nada as far as anyone can see. But bullies are nearly always actually very sad empty individuals who mask their social inadequacies through their brutish behaviours and you clearly conform to the phenotype 110%.

